Tag Archives: alabama

The PR of Politics

By Amanda Coppock

In light of recent remarks by Alabama’s newly elected Gov. Robert Bentley, I can’t help but wonder: do politicians realize they have such a strong impact on their states’ reputations? Any governor of a state or president of a country has a big job: not only to serve their political function, but also to serve as the PR person of the area they represent.

When electing politicians, citizens often consider far more than the political stance of the hopefuls. The politician’s ability to present himself and his reputation — both morally and politically — likely influences most citizens’ votes. We would never (I hope) elect someone who was known for infidelity, heavy drinking or violent tendencies. These traits do not necessarily lessen the individual’s ability to govern but do make unappealing qualities in a representative.

This is not to say that Gov. Bentley has a bad reputation or questionable morals — in fact it is quite the opposite. He is known for his strong religious convictions, which perhaps led to this PR blunder. During a church service before his inauguration on Martin Luther King Jr. Day he said, “So anybody here today who has not accepted Jesus Christ as their savior, I’m telling you, you’re not my brother and you’re not my sister, and I want to be your brother.”

Speaking as a Baptist preacher or even as an individual citizen, Bentley would not have raised any eyebrows. However, speaking as the governor, Bentley did not choose his words wisely, which implied that he would only represent Christians. Some even felt that he was trying to use his position to push Christianity upon others. These remarks quickly caught the attention of the national news, primarily because fewer people were upset by his comments than would be expected. While what he said was not bad in and of itself, it made Alabama citizens look like they do not accept those of other religions.

On the other end of the spectrum, there are many politicians whose loose morals have been the cause of bad PR for their states. Take, for example, former Gov. Mark Sanford of South Carolina. As if having an extramarital affair would not bring enough negative attention to his state, using state funds to travel to Argentina and lying about his whereabouts added insult to injury. He has managed to fly somewhat under the radar since the publicity explosion of 2009, but most people now think of his scandal when considering South Carolina politics.

Needless to say, politicians are in a very public position. Their personal opinions and choices affect their politics. As a citizen, I hope that those elected think about PR in everything they do. Public relations is all about relating to the public, which is something a politician must do on a daily basis. While remaining under constant public scrutiny cannot be easy, it is a part of a politician’s job description and so it is his responsibility to keep that in mind.

What do you think about a politician’s responsibilities when it comes to representing her citizens? Should her personal life and opinions weigh on her ability to govern?

2 Comments

Filed under Ethics

Juicy Campus: Too Hot for Comfort

WARNING: To those interested in visiting this Web site (http://www.juicycampus.com/posts/gossips/all-campuses/), be aware of the hateful speech and offensive language and material.

Look out Facebook, beware MySpace, there’s a new social media sheriff in town. Just last week, the Web site http://www.juicycampus.com was called to my attention. Juicy Campus is a social networking Web site for university students to post their latest gossip. After scanning the site, an important question popped into my thoughts. Just how much positive networking does this Web site produce? After a deeper look into Juicy Campus, I can confidently say the answer is zero. There is no benefit to Juicy Campus. Being in the public relations field, it is our duty to be aware of the most recent trends. That being said, I have chosen to explain this Web site and why it teeters on the line of dangerous.

Anonymity
Juicy Campus prides itself on 100 percent anonymity for its participants. This distinct trait allows anyone to post anything without comments being censored. This type of free range posting gives people remorseless confidence. Hateful language towards ethnicities, genders, organizations and sexual orientation make up the majority of the Web site.

One way advantage
There are various catches to Juicy Campus’s set up. Catch #1 is that it favors one-sided communication. The sender of a message can post whatever he or she chooses, yet the receivers cannot delete any of these messages. This, in no way, represents an equal communicative exchange. To render total control to the message sender leaves the receiver powerless and bitter. This is the reason for the harsh comments that follow certain messages. There is a reply option below each post allowing readers to write opinions. This sparks anonymous arguments rather than constructive criticism.

People, beware what you post
After reviewing Juicy Campus, I was concerned with the issues of slander, libel and the First Amendment. For information on media law, I looked toward Dr. Matt Bunker, a professor in journalism at The University of Alabama. When asked about these issues, Bunker provided ample explanation. He says libel occurs, “If someone writes false statements about another person that harms that person’s reputation.” Now, it’s time to unveil catch # 2. A Web site, such as http://www.juicycampus.com, is likely to avoid legal responsibility for harmful statements made on its Web site. Bunker said, “under federal law section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, Web site owners are generally immune from lawsuits over statements made by their users.” The First Amendment protects free speech in order to maintain the open exchange of ideas. However, if you were to specifically name a person, the university he or she attends and a detailed description of the person, you could be held accountable. This means that if you cross the line, and someone feels defamed, it is you that he or she is coming after.

Future implications
In an era when people ages 8 to 80 are incorporating social media into their daily lives, a Web site like this could be dangerous to participants once they leave the comfort of their computer. We all remember the high school girl who was violently beaten by her peers over rumors she posted on http://www.myspace.com (Read more). Juicy Campus has the potential to lead to events such as this. Message posters may not be as protected under the blanket of ambiguity as they think, and violence may occur due to hateful rumors. Our society, both on and off line, is constantly changing. Though we do not know whether http://www.juicycampus.com is a mere fad or a steadfast addition to social media, it is up to us, as PR students, to remain informed. Now that you have my opinion, I encourage you to visit the Web site and form your own.

For additional information on Juicy Campus:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24009077/

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized